Who am I today?
In my first blog, I was a terrified science student. I pretended like I was successful, and hid behind the false image of a successful student who had many job and volunteer experiences. Also, my identity at that time was largely tied up in high school; in my first blog, I wrote about the clubs I was in during high school, where I grew up, and so on. And although I had just received my concentration release and knew I was almost to graduation, I didn’t feel that “college student” was a large part of my identity. This semester I took smaller classes, led two study groups, and worked in a lab. Now, I feel like I have become more of a scientist and college student, although I still strongly associate with my home life. I feel like a beginning expert in the field of biochemistry, rather than just a student taking introductory classes because they are required. And through exploring the Teach for America program and other career paths, I feel like I am more confident in my decision to pursue medicine. Although I wasn’t accepted into Teach for America, I feel like I learned a lot about the interview process, the “real world,” and my wants and interests. Overall, I feel like I have made more changes in my self-image than during this semester than any other, and am appreciative for the successes and failures I have experienced.
In evaluating my first blog and my identity as a writer, my writer identity was somewhat grim. In that blog, I tried to put all of my accomplishments out on the table with the hope that my English teacher and English class would see that I was a hard worker, even if I wasn’t a good writer.
Before this class, I always thought that I was a mediocre writer. Although I still believe that I am better at science and math than English, I definitely believe that I have improved my writing. Before this class, I often got good grades on writing assignments in other classes by just following the rubric. Now, I understand the value of analyzing each rhetorical move I make. Rather than just using a quote because it looks good, I try to evaluate if it will elicit the effect I think it will have in the reader, and whether that effect is conducive to the my argument.
When I started writing my blogs, I had two audiences in mind: my teacher and myself. When I wrote my blogs, I wanted to impress Brett, so I added statistics, quoted a few sources, and tried to integrate my ideas. At other times, I felt like the blog was a space to just get my ideas out of my mind and on paper so I could clarify what I was thinking. At the start of the semester, I had no intentions of appealing to my classmates or to my readers; I just wanted a good grade. I think that my mindset has changed. Now, when I write a paper or a blog, I think more thoroughly about who will be reading it (although occasionally my blogs are mostly for reflection and personal interest). Rather than just delving into my argument, I give background information. For example, if I want to discuss how Hochschild’s theory applies to teachers, I now realize that the audience may not even know what Hochschild’s theory is. Therefore, I explain background information before making my argument. Also, when I persuade, I feel like I have to make my audience identify with my general opinions or find a common ground to relate to them and make them feel comfortable. As Maurice Charland explains, you must “constitute” your audience by hailing them and making them comfortable with the perspective you are coming from. Unless you get your audience to identify with what you are arguing, you will never be able to motivate them to action or even agree with you on an issue.
Also, when I started writing in this class, I always felt like writing was a required task, not something that I could enjoy or that had many everyday uses. I also didn’t think that writing was worth much time and that writing papers actually made me more confused. Now, I feel like writing is important in my life both in and outside the classroom. Writing doesn’t cloud my mind; it shows me what I am thinking, even if what I’m thinking is a little cloudy and convoluted. Then, by examining what I am thinking on paper, I am better able to reflect on my thoughts and realize which thoughts are genuinely useful and logical and which are worthy of disposal. When I feel stressed about family affairs or about a bad night at hospice, writing lets me get my emotions out. Writing allows me to think practically about what decisions I make in life and which one are for the best and which are for the worse. Writing is not just something I do in class; it is something I can confidently do in life.
Monday, December 7, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
James,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your blog reflection and must say that I feel I have changed in similar ways as you have. At the beginning of the semester I dreaded taking this English class. I just could not understand why taking English 225 was necessary for my movement science major. I began the course with a similar attitude as you and began by aiming to impress Brett with my sole focus of trying to get a good grade. I often found myself confused by assignments and class discussions and frustrated. However, soon I began to be moree open minded and after talking to Brett and seeing her emphasis of the importance of writing, I began to reevaluate how I felt. I think it was really her enthusiasm that made me at least try to appreciate writing, and soon enough I became more comfortable too. I think it is great that now both of us science major not just see but understand the importance of writing and know how to use it effectively. I am glad that you had a similar experience in this class as I did.
-Amanda U
James, JAD, good ol' Jay-Ay-Dee.
ReplyDeleteI loved this blog. Almost as much as I love this class. Don't let Brett and everyone else know, but I love writing and english. Partially because I just want someone to listen to me but also because I feel validated when I work hard on something and I see the results in front of me which is not always true when I take multiple choice tests in my icky-science classes. Also I tend to steer away from english classes because I don't think I'm good enough or I'm not some Shakespearean intellectual.
Anyway after reading your blog I realized half the times you do I do too. Everyone wants a good grade, and for people to find them impressive, but we need to stop dwelling on that so much and realize we are impressive, we're actually awesome, and if we believe that ourselves our audiences will be one step closer to believing that too.
Did you like my self-confidence speech?
Hey James,
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading your blog over the semester! I too had my worries about this English class. I've always liked the objectivity of science classes. There is a right answer in chemistry or biology and that's all you have to know. When writing, I often worry about how my teachers will subjectively receive my papers. I think that Brett taught us that there is an objective side to writing as well: the writer can deliberately make choices to achieve a desired effect. If a writer makes these careful choices (and can back up the choices with logical reasoning about why they should be effective) the writer is "right" in an objective sense. Hopefully, then, the paper will elicit the desired subjective response. I think that this idea is one of the most important ones I am taking away from this class.
Oh and something else I have noticed about your blogs: they have gotten a lot more personal. For example, in this blog, you really let down your guard. I really enjoy reading posts like this!
Angela